Counter-Terrorists (CTs) and Terrorists (Ts) face different advantages across Counter-Strike 2 maps, with each layout offering unique strategic benefits. Here's a comprehensive analysis of map sidedness in CS2:

Mirage (CT-Sided)

• 54.2% CT win rate
• Fast rotation options for defenders
• Open bombsites favor defensive positioning
• Strong mid-control opportunities for CTs

Nuke (Heavily CT-Sided)

• 55.2% CT win rate
• Multi-level design benefits defenders
• Narrow passages enable strong CT control
• 10.4% statistical advantage for CTs

Vertigo (T-Sided)

• 52.2% T win rate
• Vertical layout favors attacking plays
• Quick entry possibilities on ramps
• Advantages for early T-side aggression

Overpass (CT-Sided)

• 56.4% CT win rate
• Layout enables rapid CT rotations
• Strong defensive angle coverage
• Superior map control options for CTs

Inferno (Slightly T-Sided)

• 51.6% T win rate
• Tight chokepoints but balanced gameplay
• Recent meta shifts favor T-side strategies
• Evolution from traditional CT advantage

Anubis (Strongly T-Sided)

• 56.7% T win rate
• Design promotes aggressive T plays
• Quick bombsite access
• Critical mid-control opportunities

Ancient (Balanced)

• 50.8% CT win rate
• Most balanced map in current rotation
• Requires tactical flexibility
• Slight CT advantage in layout

Key Factors Affecting Map Sidedness:

• Chokepoint placement
• Bombsite accessibility
• Rotation times
• Defensive positions
• Utility usage opportunities
• Strategic control points

Understanding these dynamics helps teams adapt their strategies and maximize their chances of success on each map.

Related Articles

Previous Articles